28-Apr-2019 06:06

Decision In light of the foregoing, the Panel decides that: (1) The Domain Name registered by Respondent and at issue here is confusingly similar to Complainants trademarks, (2) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name at issue, and (3) The Domain Name at issue has been registered and is being used in bad faith by Respondent.This archived index provides an incomplete list of UDRP proceedings.The Proceeding Number consists of the abbreviated name of the dispute-resolution service provider followed by the number assigned by that provider to the proceeding.ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Arizona Board of Regents for and on behalf of Arizona State University v. Issuance of Complaint The Complaint indicates that WHOIS records for the Domain Names list Respondent Value Holdings, Inc. The February, 2000 printout of the site is attached as Annex L. As of the time of filing this Complaint, the is "Eric Draven." See Annex M. By linking ASUs marks to its pornographic website, Value Holdings is tarnishing ASUs famous marks.

Condoms, for example, are available in vending machines, and the birth control pill is free for anyone under age 21.But it must address certain core principles — among them, sexual diversity and sexual assertiveness.It’s about having open, honest conversations about love and relationships.Decisions under the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy are subject to challenge by court action.

For information about a specific court action, contact the court handling the action or a legal search resource.The University is also an internationally recognized research institution and center for the promotion of cultural and performing arts.